Student Conduct Processes

Student Conduct Authority

 

Authority  

The Director of Student Conduct is vested with the authority over student conduct and overseeing and managing the student conduct process. The Director of Student Conduct may appoint administrative hearing and appeals officers as deemed necessary to efficiently and effectively supervise the student conduct process.

The Director of Student Conduct (or designee) will assume responsibility for the investigation of an allegation of misconduct to determine if the complaint has merit, except in cases involving Title IX, wherein the complaint will be forwarded to the Title IX Coordinator for investigation.

Gatekeeping

No complaint will be forwarded for a hearing unless there is reasonable cause to believe a policy has been violated. Reasonable cause is defined as some credible information to support each element of the offense, even if that information is merely a credible witness or a victim’s statement. A complaint wholly unsupported by any credible information will not be forwarded for a hearing.

Conflict Resolution Options

The Director of Student Conduct has discretion to refer a complaint for mediation or other forms of appropriate conflict resolution. All parties must agree to conflict resolution and to be bound by the decision with no review/appeal. Any unsuccessful conflict resolution can be forwarded for formal processing and hearing; however, at no time will complaints of physical sexual misconduct or violence be mediated as the sole institutional response. The Director of Student Conduct may also suggest that complaints that do not involve a violation of the Code of Student Conduct be referred for mediation or other appropriate conflict resolution.                                                                         

Composition of the University Student Conduct Hearing Board

The Director of Student Conduct will be responsible for assembling the Hearing Board according to the following guidelines:

  1. The membership of the board is selected from a pool of at least 10 students, 6 faculty members, and 6 staff/administrative members appointed and trained annually by the Director of Student Conduct.
  2. For each complaint, a board will be chosen from the available pool, and is usually comprised of three students, one faculty member, and one staff member or administrator. Availability may determine a different composition for the Board. The Director of Student Conduct appoints the non-voting chair of the Hearing Board, who assures that UNA procedures are followed throughout the hearing.
Administrative Hearing Officers

Administrative Hearing Officers (AHO) are chosen from a pool of annually trained administrators or staff members selected by the Director of Student Conduct.

Board Pool and the Appeals Board

Three-member Appeals Boards are drawn from the board pool, with the only requirement being that they did not serve on the Board for the initial hearing. Appeals Boards review appeal requests submitted by the Director of Student Conduct.

To serve in the board pool, students must:

  1. Be of sophomore, junior, senior, or graduate student classification, be in academic good standing and have completed 15 hours of academic credit with a cumulative GPA of at least 2.0.
  2. Be in good standing with the conduct process throughout the semester in which they serve. Good standing is defined as having no record of misconduct during the semester(s) in which a student wishes to serve on the board. A serious history of misconduct could disqualify a student for service.
  3. Submit a letter of recommendation from a faculty member or administrator from within the University community.

The Director of Student Conduct will have final authority to approve all those serving on the board. The non-voting advisor to the board is the Director of Student Conduct (or designee) with responsibility for training the board, conducting preliminary investigations, and ensuring a fair process for the party bringing the complaint and responding student. In the event of a resignation from the board, the Director of Student Conduct (or designee) will solicit a replacement from the group from which the representative came. Decisions made, and sanctions imposed, by the board or an AHO will be final and implemented, pending the normal appeal process. At the discretion of the Director of Student Conduct (or designee), implementation of sanctions may be stayed pending review.

Interpretation and Revision

The Director of Student Conduct will develop procedural rules for the administration of hearings that are consistent with provisions of the Code of Student Conduct. Material deviation from these rules will, generally, only be made as necessary and will include reasonable advance notice to the parties involved, either by posting online and/or in the form of written communication. The Director of Student Conduct may vary procedures with notice upon determining that changes to law or regulation require policy or procedural alterations not reflected in this Code. The Director of Student Conduct may make minor modifications to procedure that do not materially jeopardize the fairness owed to any party. Any question of interpretation of the Code of Student Conduct will be referred to the Vice President for Student Affairs, whose interpretation is final. The Code of Student Conduct will be updated annually under the direction of the Director of Student Conduct with a comprehensive revision process being conducted every 5 years.